nmtb, 71.5, with ZERO engine work... the only thing that's been touched is the induction. And to put it in perspective even more, the bike made a healty 61 before the kit was fitted. It now makes that same 61bhp 2000rpm lower down the rev range! Put equal riders on that 74bhp 250 and then on the 300cc and see who would lap faster.

How much do you think it costs to get a 'reliable' 74 out of an nsr?? Certainly an awful lot more than the 650GBP that tyga charge for the kit. That's less than a set of Jha pipes... The bike is also set up at a VERY conservative CO2 reading of between 6.5-6.75% throughout the rev range. Most 250 race bikes, whether SS400 class or GP class, RS or TZ's, are set up at around 3.5%. The 300cc at those readings would, according to Dynotech where the bike was sorted, who also have proven national level experience in tuning 2-strokes reliably, make around 76-77bhp. And that's still with no engine work.

and if you're still not convinced, ask tyga how much their 300 is now making... rumour has it around 83bhp. for a road bike engine that's pretty good, especially considering they've calculated porting on the 300 barrels themselves, without the tens of thousands that Honda would've spent when developing the nsr.

so that's how it ONLY makes 71.5, and only wheelies of the throttle in 2nd
_________________
NSR300R - Why did i ever have a 250...