NSR250.net Forums Logo: Honda NSR 250 Forums, Classifieds and Service Manual in English. Covering All Honda NSR 250 MC16, MC18, MC21 and MC28 models
NSR250.net Forums

#
 
#
 
Performance Engineering

  • NSR250 Forums Index ‹ NSR250R Discussion
  • Members Content
  • Members Garage
  • Subscription
  • Transactions
  • FAQ
  • Search
  • Register
  • Log in

TYGA Carbon Reeds Vs HRC Non-Carbon Reeds


Reply to topic   printer-friendly view
Page 1 of 1   Download Topic





diviCe

 
Posts: 122
Joined: 09 May 2009

Location: Melbourne
1995 Honda NSR250 MC28SP
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

TYGA Carbon Reeds Vs HRC Non-Carbon Reeds

Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:44 am » Post: #1 » Download Post

Which one is better?


Cheers
Minh
_________________
It's Good to be Bad!
Back to top


nsrdownunder

 
Posts: 467
Joined: 21 Apr 2009

Location: down under
1993 Honda nsr 250 mc21 sp
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:52 am » Post: #2 » Download Post

I would say carbon are better but i like being able to say i have the HRC bits Laughing
Back to top


Hermit

 
Posts: 588
Joined: 08 Jun 2005

Location: Paraparaumu, New Zealand
1992 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:13 am » Post: #3 » Download Post

The carbon ones certainly look faster. Especially when framed by an official NSR-World carbon carb shroud. Mmmmm carbon shrouuudd.....

Don't you think Tyga should make carbon flywheel/ignition covers for the NSR? I reckon they ought to.
_________________
After years of moaning about immigrants now i am one...
Back to top


StephenRC45
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: 28 Jan 2004

Location: Cornwall, England
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:32 am » Post: #4 » Download Post

The proper HRC reed for the NSR is nothing like the stock reed. It also uses a differnt reed cage to the stock one.

So are the carbon reeds better than the HRC ones? No.

Are they better than the stock reeds? Yes in some areas.
_________________
If I have to take the carbs off once more...
Back to top


diviCe

 
Posts: 122
Joined: 09 May 2009

Location: Melbourne
1995 Honda NSR250 MC28SP
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:38 pm » Post: #5 » Download Post

How about HRC Reed Valves & Stuffers, with TYGA's Carbon Reeds?

Or HRC all the way?
Back to top


StephenRC45
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: 28 Jan 2004

Location: Cornwall, England
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:11 pm » Post: #6 » Download Post

The TYGA reeds wont fit the true HRC reed cages.

The TYGA reeds work well enough with the stock reed cages and stuffers but don't perform as well as the full HRC set up (which as it happens doesn't use the plastic stuffer).

It's a good compromise though as the HRC reeds and cages arn't very common.
_________________
If I have to take the carbs off once more...
Back to top


fontyyy

 
Posts: 3509
Joined: 10 Apr 2004

Location: Derbyshire, England
1991 Honda NSR250 MC21
    Send private message View user's profile Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
    Reply with quote  

Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:18 am » Post: #7 » Download Post

oohhh, I must have blinked and missed this one!

More of Steve's word games...these comments may both be true.

StephenRC45 wrote:The proper HRC reed for the NSR is nothing like the stock reed. It also uses a differnt reed cage to the stock one.

StephenRC45 wrote:The TYGA reeds wont fit the true HRC reed cages.


But there are HRC reeds and HRC stuffers that fit the stock NSR reed cages.

Anyone got any experience of back to back testing these with either stock or Tyga (or anyone elses) reeds?
_________________
Please do not PM me technical questions, if you can't find it on the Forum start a thread
Back to top


t3racing
Supporter - Carbon
Supporter - Carbon
 
Posts: 203
Joined: 04 Apr 2007

Location: warwickshire
1990 Honda NSR300 MC21 SP
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:26 pm » Post: #8 » Download Post

Well i had a set of highly modified reed cages made which gave me roughly 1.5bhp over the HRC reed stuffers and reeds [standard mc21 reed cages] on Steve's dyno! Although it does not appear until the top part of the power curve it pulls a lot better on the road.

So you can improve on HRC parts........
_________________
MC21 300
Aprilia RS250 track bike
Back to top


Matt@TYGA
Supporter - Vendor
Supporter - Vendor
 
Posts: 1818
Joined: 15 Sep 2004

Location: In my office chair, in Pattaya, Thailand
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
    Reply with quote  

Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:41 pm » Post: #9 » Download Post

HRC parts are not the final word. As with most commercially available stuff they are a good starting point and should be played with. On my old race bike I epoxied the plastic stuffers into the valve and then filled in with more epoxy and got grinding.

15 or so years ago I spent many hours on the dyno testing reed valves. This was after reading through lots of Yamaha white papers on the subject. Very interesting and worth searching for if you can be bothered. There's a lot about carb to reed area ratio and what they say makes sense, and tests out as gospel on the dyno and in the real world.

Remember the old steel reeds? They always seemed to fail at the most inconvenient times. This was basically down to fatigue and constantly hitting their natural frequency of resonance, which would cause them to slowly but sure destroy themselves. Thankfully, fibre and carbon reeds have a high frequency of resonance that you dont get to, so they don't (usually) fly to pieces. Where they do suffer is from the constant heat cycling and fuel washing, which breaks down and softens the epoxy holding them together.

If you want to play with reeds then you should really be looking to widen them first before increasing the lift. If you can get the same area but with less lift them the petals react faster and performance is improved. Remember that at 12,000rpm that poor little petal is opening and slamming shut at 200 times a second, so if it only has to lift say 10mm instead of 11mm then that's 2mm less travel per cycle, or 40cm per second. That's gotta be a good thing when you're looking for fast reaction times.

Another thing about lift is that if you try going too high then there's a chance that the reeds won't hit the stopper and they become unstable. HRC and others have got round this with stiff reeds or extra supporting reeds and don't actually use a stopper. The reed tension is sufficient to control this.

Anyway. It's bedtime.
Back to top


{.bLanK}GoD

 
Posts: 174
Joined: 15 Oct 2009

Location: Christchurch, NZ
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:22 am » Post: #10 » Download Post

As always Matt, good information. Did you see your mudguard?
Back to top


Matt@TYGA
Supporter - Vendor
Supporter - Vendor
 
Posts: 1818
Joined: 15 Sep 2004

Location: In my office chair, in Pattaya, Thailand
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
    Reply with quote  

Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:02 am » Post: #11 » Download Post

Yep, saw the mudguard. Very nice.
Back to top


2T Institute
Supporter - Carbon
Supporter - Carbon
 
Posts: 78
Joined: 02 Sep 2010

Location: Here, there and over here
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:21 am » Post: #12 » Download Post

I don't think (when on pipe) the petal returns to seat on the cage, before it's sucked open again.Your engine will run without reeds or rotary valves when on pipe.
Central splitters help to direct air at the petal tip where it bends easiest, that looses the least amount of inertia.
Back to top


Matt@TYGA
Supporter - Vendor
Supporter - Vendor
 
Posts: 1818
Joined: 15 Sep 2004

Location: In my office chair, in Pattaya, Thailand
    Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
    Reply with quote  

Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:46 am » Post: #13 » Download Post

I have to say that I beg to differ.

Now then, I've never actually seen a reed at full chat under a high speed camera, but given that it is primarily a one way valve then it would need to completely seal the crankcase for it to be effective. Look at the blowback on an old piston ported or a rotary valved stroker that's been tuned for more power and you can plainly see that having the case unsealed at the wrong time is not good.

Yes an engine will probably run without the reeds installed, but not particularly efficiently.

Let's say you have a transfer port effective area of 850mm^2, and a 32mm carb (804mm^2) then during crank case compression you'd lose a lot of the charge back through the carb, but maybe transfer enough to keep it running. That's not taking any intake velocity, or exhaust suction pulses into account.

From various literature written by people who know more than me, a reed valve opens around 120 degree BTDC at low rpm, closing again at about 40 degree ATDC. And then there's a pretty linear change up to high rpm where the open duration increases from 160 degree up to over 200 degree, but the opening point has now moved to about 80 degree BTDC while the closing is some 120 degree ATDC. So basically the reed valve 'adjusts' to the engine requirements.

A simple 2 stroke engine is only an air pump after all. Try taking the reed valves out of your air compressor and see how long it takes to get any pressure.
Back to top


2T Institute
Supporter - Carbon
Supporter - Carbon
 
Posts: 78
Joined: 02 Sep 2010

Location: Here, there and over here
    Send private message View user's profile
    Reply with quote  

Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:35 am » Post: #14 » Download Post

Two strokes are not simple they only seem simple Laughing (sic F.Overmars)
If the reed timing self adjusts what causes that? The throttle? The reeds themselves? The ignition? RPM? My bet is again the pipe(and the throttle). The reeds will not open fully when the throttle is not open fully.
Stand off in non existant on rotary valve engines when on pipe same with piston ports. The common theme is that the PIPE is the over riding influence. I can assure you that a inlet where it uses reeds to start and then swing out of the way once on pipe makes much better HP on the dyno and runs perfectly.
Any simple simulator shows the reeds lifting at BDC as this is the time the pipe is sucking hardest.If the engine wanted more air/fuel at this point why not give it to the engine? The fully open inlet is similar to above the exhaust port starting holes in big bore mxers and perforated rear cone kart pipes. The holes 'disappear' when on pipe,
Back to top


Reply to topic   printer-friendly view
Page 1 of 1   Download Topic

NSR250R Discussion

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

  • NSR250 Forums Index
  • All times are GMT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Hosted by NSR250dotNET © 2008 NSR250dotNET